7. CONSIDER AUTHORIZATION OF FUNDS TO RENT
IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT FOR THE SAN CARLOS AREA IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Meeting Date: July 19, 2004 Budgeted:
Yes
Program/Line
Item No.: 2-1-1-A
General Counsel Approval: N/A
Committee Recommendation: The Administrative Committee reviewed this item on July 12, 2004 and recommended ______.
SUMMARY: The District has irrigated riparian vegetation
in the vicinity of Cal-Am’s San Carlos Well since 1988 (except for the 1995 and
1998 El Niño years) to offset the impacts associated with ground water pumping.
Over the years, several irrigation techniques including drip irrigation have
been used. However, for this particular
site, a temporary sprinkler irrigation system has been found to be the most
successful method. This system can be
rented at relatively low cost and requires little to no maintenance except for
initial set up in summer and removal during the winter season.
RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the General Manager to rent
irrigation equipment from Rain for Rent at a cost not to exceed $2,500. If approved, this item will be adopted along
with the Consent Calendar. The
Administrative Committee considered this item at its July 12, 2004 meeting and
recommended _________.
IMPACTS ON STAFF AND RESOURCES: The Fiscal Year 2004-2005 budget includes
funds to rent irrigation equipment for the San Carlos Irrigation System. Funds are budgeted under Program 2-1-1-A,
Riparian Habitat Mitigations, Irrigation Program, “Operate and maintain 4-well
system” (Account No. 4-7850.11, $5,000).
Costs for rental of the irrigation equipment will not exceed $2,500. This work will be performed under the
direction of the District’s Riparian Projects Coordinator.
BACKGROUND: The District continues to operate nine irrigation systems in
Carmel Valley to mitigate for surface and ground water diversions during the
dry season. The riparian corridor has responded favorably with additional
growth and diversity, contributing to channel stability and enhancing riparian
habitat.
For the San Carlos site, sprinkler irrigation
has been found to be the most successful method. This is because the vegetation in this area has become very dense,
indicating a successful irrigation program, and replacing clogged emitters and
performing annual maintenance has become too hazardous and difficult. For the past three years, the District has
rented portable aluminum laterals with impact sprinkler heads on four-foot
risers. The laterals are placed along
the toe of the bank, and the risers allow irrigation of the banks plus about 40
feet on the terrace above the river channel.
District staff has investigated purchasing the
equipment as an alternative to renting.
The cost to purchase the equipment is about $10,000. In addition to the high capital cost, if the
District were to own the equipment, it would need to be stored for much of the
year, when the river is flowing. There
is not adequate space at Cal-Am’s San Carlos Well nearby, and space is not
available at storage sites the District is now renting. For these reasons, the District has found
renting the equipment to be the best option.
Rain for Rent was chosen because of their location and price in
comparison with other irrigation equipment suppliers. Their business office is in South Salinas, and they have
equipment storage sites throughout the county.
Their other primary source for District irrigation equipment and
supplies, Martin’s Irrigation Supply, has an office in Sand City, but they do
not carry the type of equipment needed for the San Carlos Irrigation
System. The District has used Rain for
Rent for four years, and the service and equipment have been excellent.
U:\staff\word\committees\Admin\20040712\07\item7.doc